Strongest Businesses by Quality Score (2026)
Highest Quality scores based on Piotroski + Buffett. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
| # | Ticker | Score | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABBV | 6.2 | 10.0 |
| 2 | APP | 4.7 | 10.0 |
| 3 | CTAS | 5.5 | 10.0 |
| 4 | INTU | 4.7 | 10.0 |
| 5 | KLAC | 7.9 | 10.0 |
| 6 | LDOS | 5.2 | 10.0 |
| 7 | NWSA | 6.1 | 10.0 |
| 8 | NWS | 5.9 | 10.0 |
| 9 | PH | 7.7 | 10.0 |
| 10 | TT | 6.6 | 10.0 |
| 11 | VMC | 5.6 | 10.0 |
| 12 | ATI | 7.9 | 10.0 |
| 13 | BSY | 4.6 | 10.0 |
| 14 | AWI | 5.4 | 10.0 |
| 15 | KRG | 6.6 | 9.8 |
| 16 | BK | 6.9 | 9.7 |
| 17 | EG | 6.9 | 9.7 |
| 18 | FDS | 5.7 | 9.7 |
| 19 | FISV | 5.1 | 9.7 |
| 20 | HIG | 6.9 | 9.7 |
| 21 | L | 7.4 | 9.7 |
| 22 | MS | 6.5 | 9.7 |
| 23 | PNC | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| 24 | RF | 7.3 | 9.7 |
| 25 | SYF | 7.0 | 9.7 |
| 26 | TRV | 7.4 | 9.7 |
| 27 | FAF | 6.7 | 9.7 |
| 28 | FCFS | 7.3 | 9.7 |
| 29 | FHI | 7.5 | 9.7 |
| 30 | JHG | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| 31 | MORN | 5.4 | 9.7 |
| 32 | RGA | 7.2 | 9.7 |
| 33 | RNR | 8.1 | 9.7 |
| 34 | SEIC | 6.0 | 9.7 |
| 35 | SIGI | 6.5 | 9.7 |
| 36 | SLM | 5.9 | 9.7 |
| 37 | WBS | 8.2 | 9.7 |
| 38 | ZION | 7.7 | 9.7 |
| 39 | AGO | 7.3 | 9.7 |
| 40 | BFH | 8.7 | 9.7 |
| 41 | CATY | 7.7 | 9.7 |
| 42 | CPF | 7.7 | 9.7 |
| 43 | EVTC | 6.0 | 9.7 |
| 44 | FBP | 7.1 | 9.7 |
| 45 | FHB | 7.3 | 9.7 |
| 46 | WRLD | 5.6 | 9.7 |
| 47 | WT | 7.0 | 9.7 |
| 48 | AAPL | 6.4 | 9.6 |
| 49 | ADSK | 4.7 | 9.6 |
| 50 | CSCO | 7.5 | 9.6 |
Understanding the Quality Ranking
A stock can be cheap. It can have momentum. But if the underlying business is deteriorating, none of that matters. The Quality ranking isolates the question that should come first: is this a good business?
Two frameworks answer it. The Piotroski F-Score runs nine binary tests on the most recent financials — profitability, leverage, operating efficiency. Is net income positive? Is cash flow real (exceeding net income)? Is the debt burden shrinking? Each passed test earns a point out of 9. Academic research has shown that companies scoring 7-9 on the F-Score significantly outperform the broad market, while those scoring 0-3 tend to underperform even in bull markets.
The Buffett Quality Assessment asks a different kind of question: does this company have a moat? Consistent ROE above 15%, predictable earnings trajectory, low capital expenditure needs, manageable leverage, and stable or expanding margins — these are the hallmarks of a franchise business. A "Strong" Buffett rating means the company exhibits characteristics of a durable competitive advantage. "Reject" is a red flag.
How these two models are blended depends on the sector. Capital-intensive industries (Industrials, Energy) lean harder on Piotroski because financial discipline matters most when assets are expensive to maintain. Consumer-facing businesses give more weight to Buffett's moat criteria, where brand loyalty and pricing power determine long-term survival.
The companies at the top of this list generate consistent cash, carry manageable debt, and show improving trends. They are not necessarily the cheapest or the fastest-rising — they are the ones you would want to own through a recession.