Best Dividend Stocks by Yield (2026)
Highest yields with strong fundamentals. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
Data as of
| # | Ticker | Score | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KLIC | 7.0 | 894.79% |
| 2 | HOG | 5.8 | 32.80% |
| 3 | ABR | 3.4 | 30.27% |
| 4 | PPC | 4.5 | 29.61% |
| 5 | CCOI | 2.4 | 24.79% |
| 6 | BKNG | 3.8 | 21.43% |
| 7 | FMC | 1.3 | 21.33% |
| 8 | FBRT | 4.3 | 20.90% |
| 9 | ARR | 3.8 | 17.64% |
| 10 | PMT | 2.5 | 15.59% |
| 11 | SOLS | 1.7 | 15.40% |
| 12 | WHR | 2.5 | 13.11% |
| 13 | NLY | 5.9 | 12.85% |
| 14 | TDG | 5.0 | 12.81% |
| 15 | FLO | 2.6 | 12.44% |
| 16 | WU | 4.7 | 12.04% |
| 17 | IIPR | 6.7 | 11.83% |
| 18 | STWD | 4.3 | 11.48% |
| 19 | PRGO | 5.1 | 11.26% |
| 20 | ARE | 6.8 | 11.18% |
| 21 | BXMT | 2.9 | 11.07% |
| 22 | APAM | 5.8 | 10.74% |
| 23 | CAG | 5.3 | 10.09% |
| 24 | PK | 5.6 | 9.92% |
| 25 | BKE | 3.5 | 9.86% |
| 26 | LYB | 1.8 | 9.72% |
| 27 | VALE | 2.1 | 9.59% |
| 28 | AMSF | 3.8 | 9.52% |
| 29 | GNL | 4.2 | 9.47% |
| 30 | NOG | 2.6 | 9.43% |
| 31 | ADAM | 6.0 | 8.99% |
| 32 | RYN | 5.5 | 8.65% |
| 33 | DEA | 5.3 | 8.44% |
| 34 | ALLY | 5.1 | 8.41% |
| 35 | NAVI | 4.3 | 7.71% |
| 36 | NXRT | 2.5 | 7.68% |
| 37 | EIX | 5.3 | 7.65% |
| 38 | CALM | 5.4 | 7.64% |
| 39 | ORI | 6.1 | 7.52% |
| 40 | CWEN | 4.4 | 7.39% |
| 41 | RHI | 5.4 | 7.32% |
| 42 | DOW | 1.7 | 7.28% |
| 43 | GLPI | 4.2 | 7.21% |
| 44 | AGO | 5.8 | 7.18% |
| 45 | GSHD | 6.8 | 7.14% |
| 46 | MPT | 2.9 | 7.13% |
| 47 | CPB | 5.9 | 7.13% |
| 48 | SLG | 7.5 | 7.09% |
| 49 | UPBD | 4.6 | 7.07% |
| 50 | PFE | 5.2 | 7.07% |
Understanding the Dividend Ranking
A 6% yield looks generous until the company cuts its dividend and the stock drops 25%. This is the central tension of income investing: yield and safety pull in opposite directions. The highest yields often belong to the most troubled businesses.
This ranking sorts all 1,500+ covered stocks by current dividend yield, but it displays the composite score alongside each entry so you can immediately see whether the yield is backed by a strong business or masking a deteriorating one. A yield of 4% from a company with a composite score of 8 is a fundamentally different proposition than 4% from a company scoring 3.
Three filters separate sustainable dividends from yield traps. First, the Piotroski F-Score: companies scoring 7+ are financially healthy — positive cash flow, manageable debt, improving margins. Dividends from these businesses are funded by operations, not borrowing. Second, the payout ratio: when dividends consume more than 75% of earnings (for non-REITs), there is little cushion for a bad quarter. Third, free cash flow coverage — the ultimate reality check, because dividends are paid in cash, not accounting earnings.
Certain sectors naturally dominate this ranking. REITs must distribute at least 90% of taxable income by law, routinely yielding 3-6%. Utilities earn regulated, predictable revenue that supports steady payouts. Consumer Staples companies sell products people buy regardless of the economy.
The warning sign is any yield above 7-8%. At that level, the market is usually pricing in a dividend cut. When you see a yield that high, check the quality score first and ask: is the market right?