Best Dividend Stocks by Yield (2026)
Highest yields with strong fundamentals. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
As of Nov 6, 2026, the list has 50 stocks; AMSF ranks first.
Data as of
| # | Ticker | Score | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMSF | 4.8 | 16.14% |
| 2 | STWD | 1.5 | 15.15% |
| 3 | ADAM | 2.6 | 14.78% |
| 4 | WU | 1.9 | 14.50% |
| 5 | INSW | 6.9 | 13.25% |
| 6 | FMC | 1.6 | 13.00% |
| 7 | FLO | 2.4 | 12.26% |
| 8 | VALE | 5.1 | 12.11% |
| 9 | APAM | 5.5 | 11.92% |
| 10 | GNL | 1.7 | 10.71% |
| 11 | BKE | 5.1 | 9.95% |
| 12 | ORI | 6.5 | 9.61% |
| 13 | CAG | 2.9 | 9.58% |
| 14 | CWEN | 3.8 | 9.00% |
| 15 | FIZZ | 4.6 | 8.75% |
| 16 | UVV | 2.6 | 8.17% |
| 17 | BFS | 2.2 | 8.16% |
| 18 | GLPI | 3.3 | 8.11% |
| 19 | ARE | 1.2 | 8.09% |
| 20 | NOG | 4.7 | 7.91% |
| 21 | WHR | 2.5 | 7.90% |
| 22 | UPBD | 1.4 | 7.80% |
| 23 | VRTS | 3.9 | 7.78% |
| 24 | TDG | 3.1 | 7.68% |
| 25 | VICI | 2.2 | 7.38% |
| 26 | WD | 2.2 | 7.32% |
| 27 | NAVI | 1.9 | 7.28% |
| 28 | PRGO | 2.3 | 7.27% |
| 29 | GIS | 1.6 | 7.26% |
| 30 | RLI | 5.9 | 7.18% |
| 31 | PZZA | 2.2 | 6.99% |
| 32 | LPG | 8.3 | 6.78% |
| 33 | BX | 3.7 | 6.73% |
| 34 | JBSS | 3.9 | 6.72% |
| 35 | EPR | 2.6 | 6.70% |
| 36 | CPB | 2.6 | 6.69% |
| 37 | LKQ | 3.5 | 6.63% |
| 38 | BNL | 3.2 | 6.59% |
| 39 | PK | 4.7 | 6.44% |
| 40 | SAFE | 2.1 | 6.39% |
| 41 | VZ | 5.5 | 6.39% |
| 42 | KHC | 2.6 | 6.28% |
| 43 | DOC | 2.3 | 6.24% |
| 44 | KNTK | 5.0 | 6.16% |
| 45 | CMCSA | 4.4 | 6.09% |
| 46 | CTVA | 3.8 | 5.99% |
| 47 | PGR | 6.5 | 5.95% |
| 48 | KRC | 2.9 | 5.92% |
| 49 | MO | 5.7 | 5.83% |
| 50 | FIS | 1.8 | 5.81% |
Understanding the Dividend Ranking
A 6% yield looks generous until the company cuts its dividend and the stock drops 25%. This is the central tension of income investing: yield and safety pull in opposite directions. The highest yields often belong to the most troubled businesses.
This ranking sorts all 1,500+ covered stocks by current dividend yield, but it displays the composite score alongside each entry so you can immediately see whether the yield is backed by a strong business or masking a deteriorating one. A yield of 4% from a company with a composite score of 8 is a fundamentally different proposition than 4% from a company scoring 3.
Three filters separate sustainable dividends from yield traps. First, the Piotroski F-Score: companies rated Strong (8–9 of 9) are financially healthy — positive cash flow, manageable debt, improving margins. Dividends from these businesses are funded by operations, not borrowing. Second, the payout ratio: when dividends consume more than 75% of earnings (for non-REITs), there is little cushion for a bad quarter. Third, free cash flow coverage — the ultimate reality check, because dividends are paid in cash, not accounting earnings.
Certain sectors naturally dominate this ranking. REITs must distribute at least 90% of taxable income by law, routinely yielding 3-6%. Utilities earn regulated, predictable revenue that supports steady payouts. Consumer Staples companies sell products people buy regardless of the economy.
The warning sign is any yield above 7-8%. At that level, the market is usually pricing in a dividend cut. When you see a yield that high, check the quality score first and ask: is the market right?