Best Dividend Stocks by Yield (2026)
Highest yields with strong fundamentals. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
| # | Ticker | Score | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KLIC | 8.3 | 1036.61% |
| 2 | HOG | 5.2 | 33.79% |
| 3 | PPC | 4.2 | 29.65% |
| 4 | ABR | 3.6 | 28.09% |
| 5 | CCOI | 2.6 | 22.57% |
| 6 | BKNG | 3.8 | 21.45% |
| 7 | FBRT | 3.8 | 21.02% |
| 8 | FMC | 1.6 | 20.61% |
| 9 | EMBC | 3.8 | 18.00% |
| 10 | ARR | 4.0 | 17.24% |
| 11 | RWT | 2.0 | 15.78% |
| 12 | PMT | 3.0 | 14.25% |
| 13 | WHR | 2.5 | 13.64% |
| 14 | TWO | 5.7 | 13.22% |
| 15 | NLY | 5.4 | 13.01% |
| 16 | TDG | 5.2 | 12.52% |
| 17 | FLO | 2.8 | 12.44% |
| 18 | IIPR | 7.9 | 12.34% |
| 19 | WU | 5.2 | 12.27% |
| 20 | STWD | 4.5 | 11.58% |
| 21 | APAM | 4.8 | 11.35% |
| 22 | BXMT | 3.4 | 11.14% |
| 23 | PRGO | 1.9 | 11.12% |
| 24 | SOLS | 4.9 | 10.62% |
| 25 | LYB | 4.0 | 10.35% |
| 26 | FIZZ | 5.2 | 10.23% |
| 27 | ARE | 6.0 | 10.12% |
| 28 | BKE | 3.9 | 9.86% |
| 29 | PK | 5.2 | 9.86% |
| 30 | AMSF | 4.5 | 9.71% |
| 31 | GNL | 4.8 | 9.68% |
| 32 | NOG | 2.4 | 9.65% |
| 33 | ARI | 5.5 | 9.51% |
| 34 | VALE | 2.9 | 9.22% |
| 35 | ETD | 4.4 | 8.84% |
| 36 | ADAM | 6.0 | 8.79% |
| 37 | RYN | 5.6 | 8.74% |
| 38 | CALM | 6.0 | 8.39% |
| 39 | DEA | 5.8 | 8.35% |
| 40 | ALLY | 4.9 | 8.34% |
| 41 | GSHD | 3.8 | 8.02% |
| 42 | OXM | 3.0 | 7.85% |
| 43 | RHI | 4.6 | 7.75% |
| 44 | EIX | 8.1 | 7.63% |
| 45 | NXRT | 3.1 | 7.63% |
| 46 | ORI | 5.4 | 7.58% |
| 47 | DOW | 4.2 | 7.56% |
| 48 | NAVI | 1.8 | 7.44% |
| 49 | AGO | 5.9 | 7.35% |
| 50 | UPBD | 6.2 | 7.11% |
Understanding the Dividend Ranking
A 6% yield looks generous until the company cuts its dividend and the stock drops 25%. This is the central tension of income investing: yield and safety pull in opposite directions. The highest yields often belong to the most troubled businesses.
This ranking sorts all 1,500+ covered stocks by current dividend yield, but it displays the composite score alongside each entry so you can immediately see whether the yield is backed by a strong business or masking a deteriorating one. A yield of 4% from a company with a composite score of 8 is a fundamentally different proposition than 4% from a company scoring 3.
Three filters separate sustainable dividends from yield traps. First, the Piotroski F-Score: companies scoring 7+ are financially healthy — positive cash flow, manageable debt, improving margins. Dividends from these businesses are funded by operations, not borrowing. Second, the payout ratio: when dividends consume more than 75% of earnings (for non-REITs), there is little cushion for a bad quarter. Third, free cash flow coverage — the ultimate reality check, because dividends are paid in cash, not accounting earnings.
Certain sectors naturally dominate this ranking. REITs must distribute at least 90% of taxable income by law, routinely yielding 3-6%. Utilities earn regulated, predictable revenue that supports steady payouts. Consumer Staples companies sell products people buy regardless of the economy.
The warning sign is any yield above 7-8%. At that level, the market is usually pricing in a dividend cut. When you see a yield that high, check the quality score first and ask: is the market right?