Top Stocks 2026 by Overall Score
Combining Quality, Value, Momentum, and Timing. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
As of Nov 6, 2026, the list has 50 stocks; LRCX ranks first.
Data as of
| # | Ticker | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LRCX | 8.4 |
| 2 | FFBC | 8.3 |
| 3 | LPG | 8.3 |
| 4 | CATY | 8.2 |
| 5 | AMAT | 8.1 |
| 6 | EAT | 8.1 |
| 7 | OFG | 8.1 |
| 8 | FBP | 7.9 |
| 9 | EWBC | 7.9 |
| 10 | PAG | 7.8 |
| 11 | FIX | 7.7 |
| 12 | SNDK | 7.7 |
| 13 | STBA | 7.6 |
| 14 | PARR | 7.5 |
| 15 | MU | 7.5 |
| 16 | ACGL | 7.5 |
| 17 | ENS | 7.4 |
| 18 | EXPD | 7.3 |
| 19 | FFIV | 7.3 |
| 20 | SAFT | 7.3 |
| 21 | WABC | 7.3 |
| 22 | NTRS | 7.3 |
| 23 | DE | 7.3 |
| 24 | ANF | 7.3 |
| 25 | DINO | 7.3 |
| 26 | PRI | 7.3 |
| 27 | SEIC | 7.3 |
| 28 | SN | 7.2 |
| 29 | KEYS | 7.2 |
| 30 | CHCO | 7.2 |
| 31 | ARM | 7.2 |
| 32 | PBR | 7.2 |
| 33 | CB | 7.2 |
| 34 | RS | 7.2 |
| 35 | STX | 7.2 |
| 36 | TXN | 7.2 |
| 37 | GWW | 7.2 |
| 38 | KLIC | 7.1 |
| 39 | MTB | 7.1 |
| 40 | CTS | 7.1 |
| 41 | NTAP | 7.1 |
| 42 | AAPL | 7.1 |
| 43 | AIT | 7.1 |
| 44 | MOG-A | 7.1 |
| 45 | UNM | 7.1 |
| 46 | PH | 7.1 |
| 47 | TER | 7.1 |
| 48 | ABCB | 7.0 |
| 49 | AX | 7.0 |
| 50 | ENVA | 7.0 |
Understanding the Composite Ranking
Most stock screeners force you to pick a lens: fundamentals or technicals, growth or value, quality or momentum. The Composite Score refuses the trade-off. It asks a harder question — what happens when you demand all four at once?
Five models feed the answer. Piotroski and Buffett assess whether the business itself is sound. Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt judge whether the price is right. Momentum — the 12-1 month return — the close about a month ago against the close about a year ago, skipping the latest month because one-month returns tend to reverse, ranked across all covered stocks — checks whether the market agrees. And the Timing axis — the minimum of Value and Momentum — acts as a kill switch against value traps: stocks that look cheap but keep getting cheaper.
What makes this ranking different from a simple weighted average is sector calibration. A utility and a SaaS company earning the same composite score got there through genuinely different evaluation paths — different metrics emphasized, different benchmarks applied. Seven sector profiles (banks, REITs, utilities, insurers, asset managers, holdings, and general) prevent the kind of apples-to-oranges comparisons that plague most screeners. See how these weights work on the methodology page.
A score of 7.5 or more is labelled Strong fit: strong business, reasonable price, positive trend. Below 3.0 is Poor fit. The ranking refreshes daily after market close across all 1,500+ covered stocks (S&P 500, MidCap 400, SmallCap 600, and select ADRs), incorporating the latest price data and quarterly SEC filings.