Top SmallCap 600 Stocks 2026 — Highest Rated by 5 Models
Best S&P SmallCap 600 stocks by composite score. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
Data as of
| # | Ticker | Score | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFAM | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 2 | LPG | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 3 | PARR | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 4 | BFH | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 5 | CATY | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| 6 | INSP | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| 7 | MTCH | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 8 | GPOR | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 9 | SAFT | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 10 | TMP | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 11 | SIG | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| 12 | WLY | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| 13 | AGYS | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 14 | ENR | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 15 | KFY | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 16 | SBH | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 17 | ATMU | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 18 | PAYC | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 19 | LNC | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 20 | VCTR | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 21 | BOX | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 22 | USLM | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 23 | DMC | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 24 | AMPH | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 25 | HRMY | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 26 | MATX | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 27 | SCSC | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 28 | SLG | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 29 | WHD | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 30 | WT | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 31 | CWEN-A | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 32 | ECPG | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 33 | KSS | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 34 | QRVO | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 35 | RNG | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 36 | SM | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 37 | ZD | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 38 | AAMI | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 39 | ABM | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 40 | BANR | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 41 | OFG | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 42 | RDN | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 43 | NIC | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 44 | FA | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 45 | CAKE | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 46 | EAT | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 47 | FULT | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 48 | MBIN | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 49 | PEB | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 50 | PFS | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Understanding the SmallCap Leaders Ranking
Every S&P 500 giant started small. Apple was a $1 billion company once. The question is not whether small-caps can produce outsized returns — Fama and French documented that size premium decades ago (roughly 11.8% annualized for small-caps vs. 10.3% for large-caps since 1926). The question is how to find the handful worth owning among hundreds of volatile, thinly-covered names.
The starting point matters. The S&P SmallCap 600 ($1-5 billion market cap) already filters out unprofitable companies — a quality gate the Russell 2000 does not apply. That single requirement eliminates hundreds of cash-burning, speculative businesses and is the primary reason the S&P 600 has historically outperformed the Russell 2000 by 1-2% annually.
AlphaStocks takes the filtering further. Every SmallCap 600 constituent runs through five investment models. The Quality axis carries outsized importance here: small companies are more fragile, so the Piotroski F-Score's nine financial health checks and Buffett's moat assessment act as structural integrity tests. A small-cap scoring 8+ on Quality has demonstrated consistent cash flow, improving margins, and manageable debt — the markers of a business that can survive a downturn and keep compounding. Sector calibration ensures each company is measured against appropriate benchmarks; a small community bank is not compared to a small biotech.
The trade-off is real: volatility runs roughly 20% annualized (vs. 15% for the S&P 500), liquidity is thinner, and a single bad quarter can crater a position. The stocks at the top of this ranking have cleared every filter — S&P profitability screens, high composite scores, positive momentum — and represent the small-cap names where risk and reward are most favorably aligned.