Top SmallCap 600 Stocks 2026 — Highest Rated by 5 Models
Best S&P SmallCap 600 stocks by composite score. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
| # | Ticker | Score | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MBIN | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| 2 | PARR | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| 3 | BFH | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| 4 | TMP | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| 5 | ECPG | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 6 | FULT | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 7 | MATX | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 8 | KLIC | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| 9 | SPNT | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 10 | INVA | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| 11 | KOP | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| 12 | LCII | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 13 | PHIN | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 14 | REX | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 15 | UNIT | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 16 | VIRT | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 17 | CATY | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 18 | CPF | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 19 | CRC | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 20 | CWEN | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 21 | CWEN-A | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 22 | OII | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| 23 | CENTA | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 24 | GBX | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 25 | MGY | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 26 | NGVT | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 27 | PFS | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 28 | UFCS | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 29 | CENT | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 30 | DOCN | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 31 | FIBK | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 32 | INSW | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 33 | LAUR | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 34 | MD | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 35 | POWL | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 36 | SM | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 37 | VCTR | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 38 | WSFS | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 39 | ASO | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 40 | MYRG | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 41 | TRN | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 42 | WABC | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 43 | WU | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 44 | AGO | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 45 | FHB | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 46 | IBP | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 47 | NTCT | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 48 | PLAB | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 49 | TRMK | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 50 | WHD | 7.3 | 7.3 |
Understanding the SmallCap Leaders Ranking
Every S&P 500 giant started small. Apple was a $1 billion company once. The question is not whether small-caps can produce outsized returns — Fama and French documented that size premium decades ago (roughly 11.8% annualized for small-caps vs. 10.3% for large-caps since 1926). The question is how to find the handful worth owning among hundreds of volatile, thinly-covered names.
The starting point matters. The S&P SmallCap 600 ($1-5 billion market cap) already filters out unprofitable companies — a quality gate the Russell 2000 does not apply. That single requirement eliminates hundreds of cash-burning, speculative businesses and is the primary reason the S&P 600 has historically outperformed the Russell 2000 by 1-2% annually.
AlphaStocks takes the filtering further. Every SmallCap 600 constituent runs through five investment models. The Quality axis carries outsized importance here: small companies are more fragile, so the Piotroski F-Score's nine financial health checks and Buffett's moat assessment act as structural integrity tests. A small-cap scoring 8+ on Quality has demonstrated consistent cash flow, improving margins, and manageable debt — the markers of a business that can survive a downturn and keep compounding. Sector calibration ensures each company is measured against appropriate benchmarks; a small community bank is not compared to a small biotech.
The trade-off is real: volatility runs roughly 20% annualized (vs. 15% for the S&P 500), liquidity is thinner, and a single bad quarter can crater a position. The stocks at the top of this ranking have cleared every filter — S&P profitability screens, high composite scores, positive momentum — and represent the small-cap names where risk and reward are most favorably aligned.