Top MidCap 400 Stocks 2026 — Highest Rated by 5 Models
Best S&P MidCap 400 stocks by composite score. Updated daily using 5 investment models.
As of Nov 6, 2026, the list has 50 stocks; EWBC ranks first.
Data as of
| # | Ticker | Score | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EWBC | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| 2 | PAG | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 3 | ENS | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| 4 | ANF | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 5 | DINO | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 6 | PRI | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 7 | SEIC | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| 8 | RS | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 9 | AIT | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| 10 | MOG-A | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| 11 | UNM | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| 12 | WTS | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 13 | FIVE | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 14 | EXEL | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 15 | NEU | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 16 | LECO | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| 17 | SIGI | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| 18 | VMI | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| 19 | THG | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| 20 | ALSN | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 21 | MSM | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 22 | NVT | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 23 | ONTO | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 24 | QLYS | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 25 | UBSI | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 26 | MUSA | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| 27 | IBOC | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| 28 | FTI | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| 29 | VICR | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| 30 | ORI | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 31 | CGNX | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 32 | HWC | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 33 | OVV | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 34 | SNX | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 35 | TTC | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 36 | WCC | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 37 | AFG | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 38 | DAR | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 39 | GMED | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 40 | HOMB | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 41 | KNX | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 42 | LNTH | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 43 | SAIC | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 44 | KRYS | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 45 | ARW | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 46 | MTG | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 47 | RNR | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 48 | SSB | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 49 | FAF | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| 50 | CART | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Understanding the MidCap Leaders Ranking
Mid-caps are followed by fewer analysts than S&P 500 companies, so a systematic score covers ground fewer professional opinions do. That is coverage, not an edge: our backtest found no statistically significant excess return from the scores.
Mid-caps (S&P adds companies of $8.0–22.7 billion market cap to the MidCap 400; the rule applies at addition, not to continued membership) have already proven they can survive. Unlike small-caps, they have scaled past the most dangerous phase of corporate life. Unlike large-caps, they have not yet hit the growth ceiling that comes with market dominance.
AlphaStocks applies the same five-model composite framework used across all 1,500+ covered stocks. Each MidCap 400 constituent is scored by the models that apply to it: Piotroski (financial health), Buffett (ten years of returns and owner earnings), Graham (defensive-investor criteria), Lynch (growth at a reasonable price), and Greenblatt (earnings yield plus return on capital). The composite blends these through sector-calibrated weights — a regional bank is not graded on the same curve as a SaaS company. See the methodology page for the full weighting breakdown.
What this ranking shows: the mid-cap companies where quality, valuation and momentum score highest together today. The scoring does not predict which will outperform; it shows which pass the most of each model's tests right now.