SAFT vs WRB
As of Sep 20, 2026, Safety Insurance Group (SAFT) scores 8.0/10 and Berkley W R (WRB) 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SAFT scores higher. SAFT trades 41% above its model fair value; WRB trades 65% above its model fair value.
SAFT
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC
8.0
Strong Buy
$103.57
WRB
BERKLEY W R CORP
5.5
Consider Buy
$70.00
SAFT vs WRB: Which is the Better Investment?
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) scores 8.0/10 while BERKLEY W R CORP (WRB) scores 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC trades at 15.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | SAFT | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 8.0/10▲ | 5.5/10 |
| Rating | Strong Buy▲ | Consider Buy |
| Price | $103.57 | $70.00 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.4▲ | 15.7 |
| ROE | 11.1% | 18.3%▲ |
| Market Cap | $2B | $28B |
| Fair Value | $73.23 | $42.51 |
| Dividend Yield | 4.6%▲ | 2.4% |
| Sector Rank | #8 of 265▲ | #165 of 265 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Graham | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Limited Data |
Related comparisons
SAFT vs WRB: Which Stock Scores Higher?
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) and BERKLEY W R CORP (WRB) are both in the Financials sector. SAFT currently leads with a composite score of 8.0/10 (Strong Buy) compared to WRB's 5.5/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer