AlphaStocks

RDN vs SAFT

As of Sep 20, 2026, Radian Group (RDN) scores 7.3/10 and Safety Insurance Group (SAFT) 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SAFT scores higher. RDN trades 27% below its model fair value; SAFT trades 41% above its model fair value.

RDN

RADIAN GROUP INC

7.3

Consider Buy

$35.00

SAFT

SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC

8.0

Strong Buy

$103.57

RDN vs SAFT: Which is the Better Investment?

RADIAN GROUP INC (RDN) scores 7.3/10 while SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) scores 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, RADIAN GROUP INC trades at 8.5x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. RADIAN GROUP INC trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricRDNSAFT
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score7.3/108.0/10
RatingConsider BuyStrong Buy
Price$35.00$103.57
P/E Ratio8.515.4
ROE11.5%11.1%
Market Cap$5B$2B
Fair Value$48.23$73.23
Dividend Yield2.7%4.6%
Sector Rank#28 of 265#8 of 265
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettStrongStrong
GrahamStrongStrong
LynchLimited DataLimited Data
GreenblattLimited DataLimited Data
View full RDNanalysis →View full SAFTanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

RDN vs SAFT: Which Stock Scores Higher?

RADIAN GROUP INC (RDN) and SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) are both in the Financials sector. SAFT currently leads with a composite score of 8.0/10 (Strong Buy) compared to RDN's 7.3/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer