GOOG vs GOOGL
As of Sep 20, 2026, Alphabet (GOOG) scores 6.6/10 and Alphabet (GOOGL) 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, the same score. GOOG trades 44% above its model fair value; GOOGL trades 46% above its model fair value.
GOOG vs GOOGL: What Is the Difference?
GOOG and GOOGL are two listed share classes of Alphabet, not two companies. GOOG is Class C stock, with no voting rights; GOOGL is Class A stock, with one vote per share.
Both classes own the same business, so their fundamentals and model scores match. What differs is voting rights and the price each class trades at: at the latest prices GOOG trades 1.4% below GOOGL ($344.34 vs $349.23).
GOOG
Alphabet Inc.
6.6
Consider Buy
$344.34
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
6.6
Consider Buy
$349.23
GOOG vs GOOGL: Which is the Better Investment?
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) scores 6.6/10 while Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) scores 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Both stocks share the same composite score. On a P/E basis, Alphabet Inc. trades at 31.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | GOOG | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.6/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Consider Buy |
| Price | $344.34 | $349.23 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.9▲ | 32.3 |
| ROE | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Market Cap | $4.2T | $4.3T |
| Fair Value | $238.68 | $238.68 |
| Dividend Yield | — | — |
| Sector Rank | #12 of 50 | #11 of 50▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Attractive |
| Buffett | Strong | Strong |
| Graham | Neutral | Neutral |
| Lynch | Strong | Strong |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Neutral |
Related comparisons
GOOG vs GOOGL: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) and Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) are both in the Communication Services sector. Both stocks are closely matched with composite scores of 6.6/10.
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer