AlphaStocks

GNW vs HMN

As of Sep 21, 2026, Genworth Financial (GNW) scores 6.6/10 and Horace Mann Educators (HMN) 6.2/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so GNW scores higher. GNW trades 27% below its model fair value; HMN trades 21% above its model fair value.

GNW

GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC

6.6

Consider Buy

$10.05

HMN

HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORP /DE/

6.2

Consider Buy

$48.36

GNW vs HMN: Which is the Better Investment?

GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC (GNW) scores 6.6/10 while HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORP /DE/ (HMN) scores 6.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORP /DE/ trades at 12.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricGNWHMN
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.6/106.2/10
RatingConsider BuyConsider Buy
Price$10.05$48.36
P/E Ratio18.612.4
ROE2.5%9.9%
Market Cap$4B$2B
Fair Value$13.80$39.88
Dividend Yield2.6%2.6%
Sector Rank#70 of 265#109 of 265
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettStrongAttractive
GrahamNeutralAttractive
LynchLimited DataLimited Data
GreenblattLimited DataLimited Data
View full GNWanalysis →View full HMNanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

GNW vs HMN: Which Stock Scores Higher?

GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC (GNW) and HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORP /DE/ (HMN) are both in the Financials sector. GNW currently leads with a composite score of 6.6/10 (Consider Buy) compared to HMN's 6.2/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer