FRT vs LAMR
As of Sep 20, 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) scores 3.2/10 and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so LAMR scores higher. FRT trades 7% above its model fair value; LAMR trades 52% above its model fair value.
FRT
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
3.2
Weak
$111.00
LAMR
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW
7.5
Strong Buy
$146.84
FRT vs LAMR: Which is the Better Investment?
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST (FRT) scores 3.2/10 while LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) scores 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW trades at 19.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FRT | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 3.2/10 | 7.5/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $111.00 | $146.84 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.3 | 19.8▲ |
| ROE | 12.7% | 22.1%▲ |
| Market Cap | $10B | $15B |
| Fair Value | $103.84 | $96.55 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.2% |
| Sector Rank | #90 of 104 | #3 of 104▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
| Buffett | Caution | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
| Lynch | Caution | Attractive▲ |
| Greenblatt | Caution | Neutral▲ |
Related comparisons
FRT vs LAMR: Which Stock Scores Higher?
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST (FRT) and LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) are both in the Real Estate sector. LAMR currently leads with a composite score of 7.5/10 (Strong Buy) compared to FRT's 3.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer