FRT vs KRG
As of Sep 20, 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) scores 3.2/10 and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so KRG scores higher. FRT trades 7% above its model fair value; KRG trades 11% above its model fair value.
FRT
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
3.2
Weak
$111.00
KRG
KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST
5.5
Consider Buy
$25.41
FRT vs KRG: Which is the Better Investment?
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST (FRT) scores 3.2/10 while KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG) scores 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST trades at 19.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FRT | KRG |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 3.2/10 | 5.5/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $111.00 | $25.41 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.3 | 19.0▲ |
| ROE | 12.7%▲ | 6.3% |
| Market Cap | $10B | $5B |
| Fair Value | $103.84 | $22.89 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.7% |
| Sector Rank | #90 of 104 | #27 of 104▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Caution | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
| Lynch | Caution | Attractive▲ |
| Greenblatt | Caution | Neutral▲ |
Related comparisons
FRT vs KRG: Which Stock Scores Higher?
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST (FRT) and KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG) are both in the Real Estate sector. KRG currently leads with a composite score of 5.5/10 (Consider Buy) compared to FRT's 3.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer