FNF vs SAFT
As of Sep 20, 2026, Fidelity National Financial (FNF) scores 4.6/10 and Safety Insurance Group (SAFT) 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SAFT scores higher. FNF trades 6% above its model fair value; SAFT trades 41% above its model fair value.
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
4.6
Weak
$42.51
SAFT
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC
8.0
Strong Buy
$103.57
FNF vs SAFT: Which is the Better Investment?
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) scores 4.6/10 while SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) scores 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC trades at 15.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FNF | SAFT |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.6/10 | 8.0/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $42.51 | $103.57 |
| P/E Ratio | 19.2 | 15.4▲ |
| ROE | 7.6% | 11.1%▲ |
| Market Cap | $11B | $2B |
| Fair Value | $40.01 | $73.23 |
| Dividend Yield | 4.1% | 4.6%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #204 of 265 | #8 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Limited Data |
Related comparisons
FNF vs SAFT: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) are both in the Financials sector. SAFT currently leads with a composite score of 8.0/10 (Strong Buy) compared to FNF's 4.6/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer