EIG vs SAFT
As of Sep 20, 2026, Employers Holdings (EIG) scores 5.8/10 and Safety Insurance Group (SAFT) 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SAFT scores higher. EIG trades 10% below its model fair value; SAFT trades 41% above its model fair value.
EIG
Employers Holdings, Inc.
5.8
Consider Buy
$48.91
SAFT
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC
8.0
Strong Buy
$103.57
EIG vs SAFT: Which is the Better Investment?
Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) scores 5.8/10 while SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) scores 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC trades at 15.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Employers Holdings, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | EIG | SAFT |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.8/10 | 8.0/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $48.91 | $103.57 |
| P/E Ratio | 106.5 | 15.4▲ |
| ROE | 0.7% | 11.1%▲ |
| Market Cap | $954.0M | $2B |
| Fair Value | $54.60 | $73.23 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 4.6%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #144 of 265 | #8 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Limited Data |
Related comparisons
EIG vs SAFT: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT) are both in the Financials sector. SAFT currently leads with a composite score of 8.0/10 (Strong Buy) compared to EIG's 5.8/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer