CPK vs NWN
As of Sep 20, 2026, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) scores 4.2/10 and Northwest Natural Holding (NWN) 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so NWN scores higher. CPK trades 22% above its model fair value; NWN trades 9% below its model fair value.
CPK
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP
4.2
Weak
$131.26
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Co
4.6
Weak
$48.30
CPK vs NWN: Which is the Better Investment?
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP (CPK) scores 4.2/10 while Northwest Natural Holding Co (NWN) scores 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Northwest Natural Holding Co has the higher composite rating of Weak. On a P/E basis, Northwest Natural Holding Co trades at 15.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Northwest Natural Holding Co trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CPK | NWN |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.2/10 | 4.6/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Weak▲ |
| Price | $131.26 | $48.30 |
| P/E Ratio | 22.0 | 15.9▲ |
| ROE | 9.0%▲ | 8.3% |
| Market Cap | $3B | $2B |
| Fair Value | $107.70 | $53.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 3.7%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #16 of 60 | #10 of 60▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
| Graham | Attractive | Attractive |
| Lynch | Caution | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Neutral▲ | Caution |
Related comparisons
CPK vs NWN: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP (CPK) and Northwest Natural Holding Co (NWN) are both in the Utilities sector. NWN currently leads with a composite score of 4.6/10 (Weak) compared to CPK's 4.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer