CPK vs NFG
As of Sep 20, 2026, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) scores 4.2/10 and National Fuel Gas (NFG) 5.1/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so NFG scores higher. CPK trades 22% above its model fair value; NFG trades 34% below its model fair value.
CPK
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP
4.2
Weak
$131.26
NFG
NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO
5.1
Consider Buy
$80.92
CPK vs NFG: Which is the Better Investment?
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP (CPK) scores 4.2/10 while NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG) scores 5.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO trades at 14.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CPK | NFG |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.2/10 | 5.1/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $131.26 | $80.92 |
| P/E Ratio | 22.0 | 14.0▲ |
| ROE | 9.0% | 36.5%▲ |
| Market Cap | $3B | $8B |
| Fair Value | $107.70 | $123.50 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 2.6%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #16 of 60 | #7 of 60▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Attractive | Attractive |
| Lynch | Caution | Attractive▲ |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Neutral |
Related comparisons
CPK vs NFG: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP (CPK) and NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG) are both in the Utilities sector. NFG currently leads with a composite score of 5.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CPK's 4.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer