AlphaStocks

CENT vs IPAR

As of Sep 20, 2026, Central Garden & Pet (CENT) scores 6.5/10 and Interparfums (IPAR) 5.3/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so CENT scores higher. CENT trades 31% below its model fair value; IPAR trades 23% below its model fair value.

CENT

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO

6.5

Consider Buy

$40.08

IPAR

INTERPARFUMS INC

5.3

Consider Buy

$112.86

CENT vs IPAR: Which is the Better Investment?

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO (CENT) scores 6.5/10 while INTERPARFUMS INC (IPAR) scores 5.3/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO trades at 15.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricCENTIPAR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.5/105.3/10
RatingConsider BuyConsider Buy
Price$40.08$112.86
P/E Ratio15.721.5
ROE10.3%19.2%
Market Cap$2B$4B
Fair Value$58.36$146.20
Dividend Yield2.7%
Sector Rank#6 of 78#24 of 78
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongAttractive
BuffettStrongNeutral
GrahamCautionNeutral
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattAttractiveLimited Data
View full CENTanalysis →View full IPARanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

CENT vs IPAR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO (CENT) and INTERPARFUMS INC (IPAR) are both in the Consumer Staples sector. CENT currently leads with a composite score of 6.5/10 (Consider Buy) compared to IPAR's 5.3/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer