CENT vs KMB
As of Sep 20, 2026, Central Garden & Pet (CENT) scores 6.5/10 and Kimberly Clark (KMB) 5.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so CENT scores higher. CENT trades 31% below its model fair value; KMB trades 31% below its model fair value.
CENT
CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO
6.5
Consider Buy
$40.08
KMB
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
5.4
Consider Buy
$97.85
CENT vs KMB: Which is the Better Investment?
CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO (CENT) scores 6.5/10 while KIMBERLY CLARK CORP (KMB) scores 5.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO trades at 15.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CENT | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.5/10▲ | 5.4/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Consider Buy |
| Price | $40.08 | $97.85 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.7▲ | 16.1 |
| ROE | 10.3% | 142.6%▲ |
| Market Cap | $2B | $33B |
| Fair Value | $58.36 | $142.57 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.4% |
| Sector Rank | #6 of 78▲ | #21 of 78 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Strong | Strong |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Attractive | Attractive |
Related comparisons
CENT vs KMB: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO (CENT) and KIMBERLY CLARK CORP (KMB) are both in the Consumer Staples sector. CENT currently leads with a composite score of 6.5/10 (Consider Buy) compared to KMB's 5.4/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer