CACC vs HASI
As of Sep 20, 2026, Credit Acceptance (CACC) scores 1.5/10 and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital (HASI) 1.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so CACC scores higher. CACC trades 28% below its model fair value; HASI trades 42% above its model fair value.
CACC
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP
1.5
Avoid
$577.01
HASI
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
1.4
Avoid
$36.74
CACC vs HASI: Which is the Better Investment?
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP (CACC) scores 1.5/10 while HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) scores 1.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP has the higher composite rating of Avoid. On a P/E basis, CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP trades at 15.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CACC | HASI |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 1.5/10▲ | 1.4/10 |
| Rating | Avoid▲ | Avoid |
| Price | $577.01 | $36.74 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.9▲ | 27.5 |
| ROE | 27.3%▲ | 1.4% |
| Market Cap | $6B | $5B |
| Fair Value | $800.44 | $25.87 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.0% |
| Sector Rank | #251 of 265▲ | #253 of 265 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Buffett | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Graham | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Caution▲ |
Related comparisons
CACC vs HASI: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP (CACC) and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) are both in the Financials sector. CACC currently leads with a composite score of 1.5/10 (Avoid) compared to HASI's 1.4/10 (Avoid).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer