WAL vs ZION
As of Sep 20, 2026, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) scores 7.9/10 and Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so ZION scores higher. WAL trades 21% below its model fair value; ZION trades 7% below its model fair value.
WAL
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION
7.9
Strong Buy
$78.60
ZION
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION /UT/
8.0
Strong Buy
$65.23
WAL vs ZION: Which is the Better Investment?
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION (WAL) scores 7.9/10 while ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION /UT/ (ZION) scores 8.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION /UT/ has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION trades at 8.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | WAL | ZION |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10▲ |
| Rating | Strong Buy | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $78.60 | $65.23 |
| P/E Ratio | 8.9▲ | 10.7 |
| ROE | 12.9%▲ | 12.4% |
| Market Cap | $9B | $10B |
| Fair Value | $100.00 | $70.39 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.6%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #13 of 265 | #10 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Strong | Strong |
| Graham | Strong | Strong |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Limited Data |
Related comparisons
WAL vs ZION: Which Stock Scores Higher?
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION (WAL) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION /UT/ (ZION) are both in the Financials sector. ZION currently leads with a composite score of 8.0/10 (Strong Buy) compared to WAL's 7.9/10 (Strong Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer