NTAP vs TPL
NetApp, Inc. vs Texas Pacific Land Corp — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
8.4
Strong Buy
$190.47
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corp
4.2
Weak
$396.98
NTAP vs TPL: Which is the Better Investment?
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 while Texas Pacific Land Corp (TPL) scores 4.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, NetApp, Inc. trades at 30.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | NTAP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 8.4/10▲ | 4.2/10 |
| Rating | Strong Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $190.47 | $396.98 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.0▲ | 56.9 |
| ROE | 101.7%▲ | 31.0% |
| Market Cap | $38B | $27B |
| Fair Value | $256.81 | — |
| Dividend Yield | 1.2%▲ | 0.5% |
| Sector Rank | #3 of 1123▲ | #757 of 1123 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Graham | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Neutral▲ | Limited Data |
NTAP vs TPL: Which Stock Scores Higher?
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and Texas Pacific Land Corp (TPL) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to TPL's 4.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer