AlphaStocks

NTAP vs TMO

NetApp, Inc. vs THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

8.4

Strong Buy

$178.60

TMO

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.

4.7

Weak

$574.39

NTAP vs TMO: Which is the Better Investment?

NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 while THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. (TMO) scores 4.7/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, NetApp, Inc. trades at 28.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. NetApp, Inc. offers more upside to its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricNTAPTMO
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score8.4/104.7/10
RatingStrong BuyWeak
Price$178.60$574.39
P/E Ratio28.132.3
ROE101.7%12.9%
Market Cap$36B$214B
Fair Value$256.81$504.28
Dividend Yield1.2%
Sector Rank#3 of 1123#621 of 1123
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongAttractive
BuffettStrongAttractive
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchNeutralCaution
GreenblattNeutralNeutral
View full NTAPanalysis →View full TMOanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

NTAP vs TMO: Which Stock Scores Higher?

NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. (TMO) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to TMO's 4.7/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer