AlphaStocks

SM vs TPL

As of Sep 20, 2026, SM Energy (SM) scores 7.4/10 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 2.2/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SM scores higher.

SM

SM Energy Co

7.4

Consider Buy

$36.99

TPL

Texas Pacific Land Corp

2.2

Avoid

$352.71

SM vs TPL: Which is the Better Investment?

SM Energy Co (SM) scores 7.4/10 while Texas Pacific Land Corp (TPL) scores 2.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. SM Energy Co has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, SM Energy Co trades at 6.6x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricSMTPL
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score7.4/102.2/10
RatingConsider BuyAvoid
Price$36.99$352.71
P/E Ratio6.650.6
ROE13.6%31.0%
Market Cap$7B$24B
Fair Value
Dividend Yield2.9%0.5%
Sector Rank#6 of 80#72 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveNeutral
BuffettNeutralNeutral
GrahamAttractiveNeutral
LynchStrongLimited Data
GreenblattLimited DataLimited Data
View full SManalysis →View full TPLanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

SM vs TPL: Which Stock Scores Higher?

SM Energy Co (SM) and Texas Pacific Land Corp (TPL) are both in the Energy sector. SM currently leads with a composite score of 7.4/10 (Consider Buy) compared to TPL's 2.2/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer