AlphaStocks

SHOO vs WWW

As of Sep 20, 2026, Steven Madden (SHOO) scores 6.1/10 and Wolverine World Wide (WWW) 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so WWW scores higher. SHOO trades 11% above its model fair value; WWW trades 35% below its model fair value.

SHOO

STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.

6.1

Consider Buy

$42.10

WWW

WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/

6.6

Consider Buy

$18.92

SHOO vs WWW: Which is the Better Investment?

STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO) scores 6.1/10 while WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/ (WWW) scores 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/ has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/ trades at 16.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/ trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricSHOOWWW
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.1/106.6/10
RatingConsider BuyConsider Buy
Price$42.10$18.92
P/E Ratio67.116.1
ROE5.2%24.4%
Market Cap$3B$2B
Fair Value$37.98$29.13
Dividend Yield2.0%2.3%
Sector Rank#40 of 194#24 of 194
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettAttractiveAttractive
GrahamNeutralCaution
LynchNeutralAttractive
GreenblattAttractiveStrong
View full SHOOanalysis →View full WWWanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

SHOO vs WWW: Which Stock Scores Higher?

STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC /DE/ (WWW) are both in the Consumer Discretionary sector. WWW currently leads with a composite score of 6.6/10 (Consider Buy) compared to SHOO's 6.1/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer