NSA vs RHP
National Storage Affiliates Trust vs Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
7.2
Consider Buy
$38.56
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
4.0
Weak
$92.46
NSA vs RHP: Which is the Better Investment?
National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) scores 7.2/10 while Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) scores 4.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. National Storage Affiliates Trust has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. trades at 25.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. National Storage Affiliates Trust offers more upside to its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | NSA | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 7.2/10▲ | 4.0/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $38.56 | $92.46 |
| P/E Ratio | 40.0 | 25.1▲ |
| ROE | 7.7% | 32.3%▲ |
| Market Cap | $3B | $6B |
| Fair Value | $44.72 | $82.72 |
| Dividend Yield | 6.2%▲ | 4.8% |
| Sector Rank | #1 of 105▲ | #81 of 105 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Caution |
| Graham | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Neutral▲ |
NSA vs RHP: Which Stock Scores Higher?
National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) are among the most compared stocks in the Real Estate sector. NSA currently leads with a composite score of 7.2/10 (Consider Buy) compared to RHP's 4.0/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer