AlphaStocks

RES vs WHD

As of Sep 20, 2026, RPC Inc (RES) scores 1.8/10 and Cactus (WHD) 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so WHD scores higher. RES trades 16% above its model fair value; WHD trades 44% above its model fair value.

RES

RPC INC

1.8

Avoid

$5.85

WHD

Cactus, Inc.

7.5

Strong Buy

$66.68

RES vs WHD: Which is the Better Investment?

RPC INC (RES) scores 1.8/10 while Cactus, Inc. (WHD) scores 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Cactus, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Cactus, Inc. trades at 27.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricRESWHD
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score1.8/107.5/10
RatingAvoidStrong Buy
Price$5.85$66.68
P/E Ratio38.727.7
ROE2.9%13.7%
Market Cap$1B$5B
Fair Value$5.05$46.34
Dividend Yield2.9%1.0%
Sector Rank#75 of 80#5 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralAttractive
BuffettCautionStrong
GrahamNeutralNeutral
LynchLimited DataStrong
GreenblattLimited DataStrong
View full RESanalysis →View full WHDanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

RES vs WHD: Which Stock Scores Higher?

RPC INC (RES) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD) are both in the Energy sector. WHD currently leads with a composite score of 7.5/10 (Strong Buy) compared to RES's 1.8/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer