PCTY vs VIK
As of Sep 20, 2026, Paylocity Holding (PCTY) scores 7.9/10 and Viking Holdings (VIK) 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so PCTY scores higher. PCTY trades 15% above its model fair value; VIK trades 20% above its model fair value.
PCTY
Paylocity Holding Corp
7.9
Strong Buy
$143.68
VIK
Viking Holdings Ltd
5.5
Consider Buy
$84.12
PCTY vs VIK: Which is the Better Investment?
Paylocity Holding Corp (PCTY) scores 7.9/10 while Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) scores 5.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Paylocity Holding Corp has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Viking Holdings Ltd trades at 32.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | PCTY | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 7.9/10▲ | 5.5/10 |
| Rating | Strong Buy▲ | Consider Buy |
| Price | $143.68 | $84.12 |
| P/E Ratio | 35.8 | 32.7▲ |
| ROE | 18.6% | 39.4%▲ |
| Market Cap | $8B | $38B |
| Fair Value | $124.78 | $70.24 |
| Dividend Yield | — | — |
| Sector Rank | #1 of 265▲ | #72 of 265 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Limited Data |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Strong▲ | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Neutral |
Related comparisons
PCTY vs VIK: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Paylocity Holding Corp (PCTY) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) are both in the Industrials sector. PCTY currently leads with a composite score of 7.9/10 (Strong Buy) compared to VIK's 5.5/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer