AlphaStocks

FTI vs PCAR

TechnipFMC plc vs PACCAR INC — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

FTI

TechnipFMC plc

8.3

Strong Buy

$73.95

PCAR

PACCAR INC

4.6

Weak

$116.50

FTI vs PCAR: Which is the Better Investment?

TechnipFMC plc (FTI) scores 8.3/10 while PACCAR INC (PCAR) scores 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. TechnipFMC plc has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, PACCAR INC trades at 25.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricFTIPCAR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score8.3/104.6/10
RatingStrong BuyWeak
Price$73.95$116.50
P/E Ratio32.225.8
ROE28.8%12.3%
Market Cap$30B$61B
Fair Value$49.72$115.78
Dividend Yield3.6%
Sector Rank#3 of 1126#681 of 1126
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongNeutral
BuffettStrongNeutral
GrahamCautionNeutral
LynchStrongNeutral
GreenblattNeutralLimited Data
View full FTIanalysis →View full PCARanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

FTI vs PCAR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and PACCAR INC (PCAR) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. FTI currently leads with a composite score of 8.3/10 (Strong Buy) compared to PCAR's 4.6/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer