AlphaStocks

NVST vs PARR

As of Sep 20, 2026, Envista Holdings (NVST) scores 4.3/10 and Par Pacific Holdings (PARR) 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so PARR scores higher. NVST trades 17% above its model fair value; PARR trades 26% below its model fair value.

NVST

Envista Holdings Corp

4.3

Weak

$23.36

PARR

PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC.

8.4

Strong Buy

$84.38

NVST vs PARR: Which is the Better Investment?

Envista Holdings Corp (NVST) scores 4.3/10 while PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades at 11.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricNVSTPARR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.3/108.4/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$23.36$84.38
P/E Ratio84.111.8
ROE1.2%25.4%
Market Cap$4B$4B
Fair Value$20.05$114.00
Dividend Yield
Sector Rank#133 of 168#2 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettNeutralStrong
GrahamNeutralCaution
LynchNeutralStrong
GreenblattAttractiveAttractive
View full NVSTanalysis →View full PARRanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

NVST vs PARR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Envista Holdings Corp (NVST) is in the Health Care sector; PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) is in Energy. PARR currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to NVST's 4.3/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer