AlphaStocks

MOS vs NTAP

MOSAIC CO vs NetApp, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

MOS

MOSAIC CO

3.7

Weak

$22.73

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

8.4

Strong Buy

$190.47

MOS vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?

MOSAIC CO (MOS) scores 3.7/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, MOSAIC CO trades at 13.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricMOSNTAP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score3.7/108.4/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$22.73$190.47
P/E Ratio13.430.0
ROE4.4%101.7%
Market Cap$7B$38B
Fair Value$256.81
Dividend Yield4.1%1.2%
Sector Rank#876 of 1123#3 of 1123
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettNeutralStrong
GrahamAttractiveCaution
LynchCautionNeutral
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full MOSanalysis →View full NTAPanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

MOS vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

MOSAIC CO (MOS) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to MOS's 3.7/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer