LQDT vs SAIC
As of Sep 20, 2026, Liquidity Services (LQDT) scores 5.6/10 and Science Applications International (SAIC) 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so SAIC scores higher. LQDT trades 96% above its model fair value; SAIC trades 29% below its model fair value.
LQDT
LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC
5.6
Consider Buy
$42.81
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp
7.5
Strong Buy
$133.28
LQDT vs SAIC: Which is the Better Investment?
LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC (LQDT) scores 5.6/10 while Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) scores 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Science Applications International Corp has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Science Applications International Corp trades at 17.3x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Science Applications International Corp trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | LQDT | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.6/10 | 7.5/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $42.81 | $133.28 |
| P/E Ratio | 49.4 | 17.3▲ |
| ROE | 11.4% | 23.8%▲ |
| Market Cap | $1B | $6B |
| Fair Value | $21.84 | $187.57 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.3% |
| Sector Rank | #64 of 265 | #7 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Attractive |
| Buffett | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Attractive▲ |
Related comparisons
LQDT vs SAIC: Which Stock Scores Higher?
LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC (LQDT) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) are both in the Industrials sector. SAIC currently leads with a composite score of 7.5/10 (Strong Buy) compared to LQDT's 5.6/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer