LAMR vs RWT
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW vs REDWOOD TRUST INC — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison
LAMR
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW
7.1
Consider Buy
$126.00
RWT
REDWOOD TRUST INC
3.5
Weak
$5.63
LAMR vs RWT: Which is the Better Investment?
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) scores 7.1/10 while REDWOOD TRUST INC (RWT) scores 3.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | LAMR | RWT |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 7.1/10▲ | 3.5/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $126.00 | $5.63 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.0 | — |
| ROE | 22.1%▲ | 5.6% |
| Market Cap | $13B | $733.3M |
| Fair Value | $103.29 | — |
| Dividend Yield | 5.2% | 14.1%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #3 of 105▲ | #95 of 105 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive▲ | Caution |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Caution |
| Graham | Attractive▲ | Limited Data |
| Lynch | Attractive▲ | Limited Data |
| Greenblatt | Neutral▲ | Limited Data |
LAMR vs RWT: Which Stock Scores Higher?
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) and REDWOOD TRUST INC (RWT) are among the most compared stocks in the Real Estate sector. LAMR currently leads with a composite score of 7.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to RWT's 3.5/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer