AlphaStocks

KWR vs PARR

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP vs PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

KWR

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP

3.3

Weak

$124.09

PARR

PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC.

8.8

Strong Buy

$61.66

KWR vs PARR: Which is the Better Investment?

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP (KWR) scores 3.3/10 while PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) scores 8.8/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricKWRPARR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score3.3/108.8/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$124.09$61.66
P/E Ratio8.6
ROE-0.2%25.4%
Market Cap$2B$3B
Fair Value$134.85
Dividend Yield1.6%
Sector Rank#971 of 1127#1 of 1127
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralStrong
BuffettCautionStrong
GrahamNeutralCaution
LynchAttractiveStrong
GreenblattCautionAttractive
View full KWRanalysis →View full PARRanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

KWR vs PARR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP (KWR) and PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. PARR currently leads with a composite score of 8.8/10 (Strong Buy) compared to KWR's 3.3/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer