KMI vs PARR
As of Sep 20, 2026, Kinder Morgan (KMI) scores 2.8/10 and Par Pacific Holdings (PARR) 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so PARR scores higher. KMI trades 33% above its model fair value; PARR trades 26% below its model fair value.
KMI
KINDER MORGAN, INC.
2.8
Avoid
$31.84
PARR
PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC.
8.4
Strong Buy
$84.38
KMI vs PARR: Which is the Better Investment?
KINDER MORGAN, INC. (KMI) scores 2.8/10 while PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades at 11.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | KMI | PARR |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 2.8/10 | 8.4/10▲ |
| Rating | Avoid | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $31.84 | $84.38 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.2 | 11.8▲ |
| ROE | 9.9% | 25.4%▲ |
| Market Cap | $71B | $4B |
| Fair Value | $23.98 | $114.00 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.6% | — |
| Sector Rank | #65 of 80 | #2 of 80▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Caution | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
Related comparisons
KMI vs PARR: Which Stock Scores Higher?
KINDER MORGAN, INC. (KMI) and PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) are both in the Energy sector. PARR currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to KMI's 2.8/10 (Avoid).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer