AlphaStocks

KALU vs USLM

As of Sep 20, 2026, Kaiser Aluminum (KALU) scores 4.7/10 and United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so USLM scores higher. KALU trades 6% below its model fair value; USLM trades 3% above its model fair value.

KALU

KAISER ALUMINUM CORP

4.7

Weak

$149.25

USLM

UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC

7.5

Strong Buy

$113.32

KALU vs USLM: Which is the Better Investment?

KAISER ALUMINUM CORP (KALU) scores 4.7/10 while UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC (USLM) scores 7.5/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, KAISER ALUMINUM CORP trades at 17.5x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. KAISER ALUMINUM CORP trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricKALUUSLM
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.7/107.5/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$149.25$113.32
P/E Ratio17.524.3
ROE12.5%21.4%
Market Cap$3B$3B
Fair Value$159.13$110.07
Dividend Yield1.9%
Sector Rank#34 of 78#1 of 78
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveAttractive
BuffettCautionStrong
GrahamCautionNeutral
LynchCautionAttractive
GreenblattNeutralAttractive
View full KALUanalysis →View full USLManalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

KALU vs USLM: Which Stock Scores Higher?

KAISER ALUMINUM CORP (KALU) and UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC (USLM) are both in the Materials sector. USLM currently leads with a composite score of 7.5/10 (Strong Buy) compared to KALU's 4.7/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer