AlphaStocks

JBGS vs LAMR

JBG SMITH Properties vs LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

JBGS

JBG SMITH Properties

3.2

Weak

$14.44

LAMR

LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW

7.1

Consider Buy

$126.00

JBGS vs LAMR: Which is the Better Investment?

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) scores 3.2/10 while LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) scores 7.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. JBG SMITH Properties offers more upside to its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricJBGSLAMR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score3.2/107.1/10
RatingWeakConsider Buy
Price$14.44$126.00
P/E Ratio17.0
ROE-58.5%22.1%
Market Cap$972.7M$13B
Fair Value$16.98$103.29
Dividend Yield4.8%5.2%
Sector Rank#97 of 105#3 of 105
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralAttractive
BuffettAttractiveStrong
GrahamNeutralAttractive
LynchNeutralAttractive
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full JBGSanalysis →View full LAMRanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

JBGS vs LAMR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and LAMAR ADVERTISING CO/NEW (LAMR) are among the most compared stocks in the Real Estate sector. LAMR currently leads with a composite score of 7.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to JBGS's 3.2/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer