IBKR vs RJF
As of Sep 20, 2026, Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) scores 6.2/10 and Raymond James Financial (RJF) 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so RJF scores higher. IBKR trades 110% above its model fair value; RJF trades 18% below its model fair value.
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
6.2
Consider Buy
$90.68
RJF
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC
6.6
Consider Buy
$164.56
IBKR vs RJF: Which is the Better Investment?
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) scores 6.2/10 while RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC (RJF) scores 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC trades at 15.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | IBKR | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.2/10 | 6.6/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $90.68 | $164.56 |
| P/E Ratio | 40.9 | 15.9▲ |
| ROE | 18.8%▲ | 17.2% |
| Market Cap | $41B | $33B |
| Fair Value | $43.10 | $199.88 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.2% |
| Sector Rank | #107 of 265 | #72 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Neutral |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Attractive▲ |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Caution▲ |
Related comparisons
IBKR vs RJF: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC (RJF) are both in the Financials sector. RJF currently leads with a composite score of 6.6/10 (Consider Buy) compared to IBKR's 6.2/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer