HUBB vs NTAP
HUBBELL INC vs NetApp, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison
HUBB
HUBBELL INC
5.3
Consider Buy
$502.38
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
8.4
Strong Buy
$190.47
HUBB vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?
HUBBELL INC (HUBB) scores 5.3/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, NetApp, Inc. trades at 30.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. NetApp, Inc. offers more upside to its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | HUBB | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.3/10 | 8.4/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $502.38 | $190.47 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.3 | 30.0▲ |
| ROE | 23.6% | 101.7%▲ |
| Market Cap | $27B | $38B |
| Fair Value | $459.40 | $256.81 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.2% |
| Sector Rank | #432 of 1123 | #3 of 1123▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Strong | Strong |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Neutral |
HUBB vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?
HUBBELL INC (HUBB) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to HUBB's 5.3/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer