AlphaStocks

GWW vs JBTM

As of Sep 20, 2026, W.W. Grainger (GWW) scores 6.3/10 and JBT MAREL (JBTM) 1.9/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so GWW scores higher. GWW trades 17% above its model fair value; JBTM trades 69% above its model fair value.

GWW

W.W. GRAINGER, INC.

6.3

Consider Buy

$1,266.90

JBTM

JBT MAREL Corp

1.9

Avoid

$109.76

GWW vs JBTM: Which is the Better Investment?

W.W. GRAINGER, INC. (GWW) scores 6.3/10 while JBT MAREL Corp (JBTM) scores 1.9/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. W.W. GRAINGER, INC. has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricGWWJBTM
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.3/101.9/10
RatingConsider BuyAvoid
Price$1,266.90$109.76
P/E Ratio35.6
ROE46.8%-1.1%
Market Cap$60B$6B
Fair Value$1,085.66$64.90
Dividend Yield0.7%
Sector Rank#32 of 265#252 of 265
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongCaution
BuffettAttractiveCaution
GrahamNeutralNeutral
LynchNeutralLimited Data
GreenblattNeutralCaution
View full GWWanalysis →View full JBTManalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

GWW vs JBTM: Which Stock Scores Higher?

W.W. GRAINGER, INC. (GWW) and JBT MAREL Corp (JBTM) are both in the Industrials sector. GWW currently leads with a composite score of 6.3/10 (Consider Buy) compared to JBTM's 1.9/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer