GS vs MS
As of Sep 20, 2026, Goldman Sachs Group (GS) scores 6.2/10 and Morgan Stanley (MS) 6.9/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so MS scores higher. GS trades 12% below its model fair value; MS trades 5% above its model fair value.
GS
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
6.2
Consider Buy
$941.99
MS
MORGAN STANLEY
6.9
Consider Buy
$202.56
GS vs MS: Which is the Better Investment?
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (GS) scores 6.2/10 while MORGAN STANLEY (MS) scores 6.9/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. MORGAN STANLEY has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC trades at 17.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.2/10 | 6.9/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $941.99 | $202.56 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.4▲ | 19.1 |
| ROE | 10.5% | 15.2%▲ |
| Market Cap | $290B | $319B |
| Fair Value | $1,076.45 | $193.22 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.9%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #106 of 265 | #52 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Neutral |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Caution | Caution |
Related comparisons
GS vs MS: Which Stock Scores Higher?
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (GS) and MORGAN STANLEY (MS) are both in the Financials sector. MS currently leads with a composite score of 6.9/10 (Consider Buy) compared to GS's 6.2/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer