AlphaStocks

GPK vs IP

As of Sep 20, 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) scores 5.3/10 and International Paper (IP) 2.8/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so GPK scores higher. IP trades 5% below its model fair value.

GPK

GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO

5.3

Consider Buy

$9.30

IP

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/

2.8

Avoid

$34.54

GPK vs IP: Which is the Better Investment?

GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK) scores 5.3/10 while INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/ (IP) scores 2.8/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricGPKIP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score5.3/102.8/10
RatingConsider BuyAvoid
Price$9.30$34.54
P/E Ratio6.3
ROE13.4%-21.9%
Market Cap$3B$18B
Fair Value$36.55
Dividend Yield4.2%5.1%
Sector Rank#21 of 78#64 of 78
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralNeutral
BuffettNeutralCaution
GrahamAttractiveNeutral
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattAttractiveCaution
View full GPKanalysis →View full IPanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

GPK vs IP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK) and INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/ (IP) are both in the Materials sector. GPK currently leads with a composite score of 5.3/10 (Consider Buy) compared to IP's 2.8/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer