AlphaStocks

GIS vs NTAP

GENERAL MILLS INC vs NetApp, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

GIS

GENERAL MILLS INC

3.0

Weak

$36.00

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

8.4

Strong Buy

$190.47

GIS vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?

GENERAL MILLS INC (GIS) scores 3.0/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. GENERAL MILLS INC offers more upside to its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricGISNTAP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score3.0/108.4/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$36.00$190.47
P/E Ratio30.0
ROE-1.0%101.7%
Market Cap$19B$38B
Fair Value$54.14$256.81
Dividend Yield6.5%1.2%
Sector Rank#997 of 1123#3 of 1123
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettNeutralStrong
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattStrongNeutral
View full GISanalysis →View full NTAPanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

GIS vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

GENERAL MILLS INC (GIS) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to GIS's 3.0/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer