AlphaStocks

GILD vs NTAP

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. vs NetApp, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

GILD

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.

4.9

Weak

$135.28

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

8.4

Strong Buy

$190.47

GILD vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (GILD) scores 4.9/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. trades at 19.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. offers more upside to its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricGILDNTAP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.9/108.4/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$135.28$190.47
P/E Ratio19.930.0
ROE38.5%101.7%
Market Cap$170B$38B
Fair Value$190.01$256.81
Dividend Yield2.5%1.2%
Sector Rank#560 of 1123#3 of 1123
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettStrongStrong
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattAttractiveNeutral
View full GILDanalysis →View full NTAPanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

GILD vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (GILD) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to GILD's 4.9/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer