AlphaStocks

FTNT vs PRGS

As of Sep 20, 2026, Fortinet (FTNT) scores 7.9/10 and Progress Software (PRGS) 6.7/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so FTNT scores higher. FTNT trades 96% above its model fair value; PRGS trades 23% below its model fair value.

FTNT

Fortinet, Inc.

7.9

Strong Buy

$169.85

PRGS

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA

6.7

Consider Buy

$40.08

FTNT vs PRGS: Which is the Better Investment?

Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) scores 7.9/10 while PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA (PRGS) scores 6.7/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Fortinet, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA trades at 24.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricFTNTPRGS
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score7.9/106.7/10
RatingStrong BuyConsider Buy
Price$169.85$40.08
P/E Ratio70.124.1
ROE148.0%15.3%
Market Cap$126B$2B
Fair Value$86.65$52.38
Dividend Yield
Sector Rank#4 of 205#42 of 205
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongAttractive
BuffettStrongAttractive
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchAttractiveCaution
GreenblattCautionAttractive
View full FTNTanalysis →View full PRGSanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

FTNT vs PRGS: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA (PRGS) are both in the Information Technology sector. FTNT currently leads with a composite score of 7.9/10 (Strong Buy) compared to PRGS's 6.7/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer