FTI vs WFRD
As of Sep 21, 2026, TechnipFMC (FTI) scores 6.6/10 and Weatherford International (WFRD) 4.1/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so FTI scores higher. FTI trades 45% above its model fair value; WFRD trades 30% below its model fair value.
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
6.6
Consider Buy
$72.07
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
4.1
Weak
$82.05
FTI vs WFRD: Which is the Better Investment?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) scores 6.6/10 while Weatherford International plc (WFRD) scores 4.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. TechnipFMC plc has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Weatherford International plc trades at 13.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Weatherford International plc trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FTI | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.6/10▲ | 4.1/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $72.07 | $82.05 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.4 | 13.8▲ |
| ROE | 28.8%▲ | 26.4% |
| Market Cap | $30B | $6B |
| Fair Value | $49.72 | $117.45 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.2% |
| Sector Rank | #12 of 80▲ | #51 of 80 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Neutral | Strong▲ |
Related comparisons
FTI vs WFRD: Which Stock Scores Higher?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Weatherford International plc (WFRD) are both in the Energy sector. FTI currently leads with a composite score of 6.6/10 (Consider Buy) compared to WFRD's 4.1/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer