FIS vs GPN
As of Sep 20, 2026, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) scores 3.7/10 and Global Payments (GPN) 7.1/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so GPN scores higher. FIS trades 15% below its model fair value; GPN trades 28% below its model fair value.
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
3.7
Weak
$35.63
GPN
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
7.1
Consider Buy
$85.07
FIS vs GPN: Which is the Better Investment?
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) scores 3.7/10 while GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC (GPN) scores 7.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FIS | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 3.7/10 | 7.1/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $35.63 | $85.07 |
| P/E Ratio | — | 14.7 |
| ROE | -3.8% | 6.1%▲ |
| Market Cap | $18B | $23B |
| Fair Value | $41.90 | $117.43 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.8%▲ | 1.3% |
| Sector Rank | #235 of 265 | #41 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Caution | Attractive▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Neutral | Attractive▲ |
| Lynch | Limited Data | Caution▲ |
| Greenblatt | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
Related comparisons
FIS vs GPN: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC (GPN) are both in the Financials sector. GPN currently leads with a composite score of 7.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to FIS's 3.7/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer