FCPT vs NSA
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. vs National Storage Affiliates Trust — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
4.6
Weak
$23.51
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
7.2
Consider Buy
$38.56
FCPT vs NSA: Which is the Better Investment?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) scores 4.6/10 while National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) scores 7.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. National Storage Affiliates Trust has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. trades at 21.5x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. National Storage Affiliates Trust offers more upside to its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | FCPT | NSA |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.6/10 | 7.2/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $23.51 | $38.56 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.5▲ | 40.0 |
| ROE | 6.8% | 7.7%▲ |
| Market Cap | $2B | $3B |
| Fair Value | $26.88 | $44.72 |
| Dividend Yield | 5.8% | 6.2%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #62 of 105 | #1 of 105▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Attractive |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Lynch | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Greenblatt | Caution▲ | Limited Data |
FCPT vs NSA: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) are among the most compared stocks in the Real Estate sector. NSA currently leads with a composite score of 7.2/10 (Consider Buy) compared to FCPT's 4.6/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer