AlphaStocks

FBIN vs MAS

As of Sep 20, 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) scores 4.8/10 and Masco (MAS) 6.3/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so MAS scores higher. FBIN trades 37% below its model fair value; MAS trades 36% below its model fair value.

FBIN

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.

4.8

Weak

$39.43

MAS

MASCO CORP /DE/

6.3

Consider Buy

$68.09

FBIN vs MAS: Which is the Better Investment?

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) scores 4.8/10 while MASCO CORP /DE/ (MAS) scores 6.3/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. MASCO CORP /DE/ has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. trades at 16.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricFBINMAS
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.8/106.3/10
RatingWeakConsider Buy
Price$39.43$68.09
P/E Ratio16.017.6
ROE-7.4%-616.0%
Market Cap$5B$14B
Fair Value$63.07$105.94
Dividend Yield1.9%1.6%
Sector Rank#125 of 265#29 of 265
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongAttractive
BuffettNeutralAttractive
GrahamNeutralNeutral
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattAttractiveAttractive
View full FBINanalysis →View full MASanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

FBIN vs MAS: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and MASCO CORP /DE/ (MAS) are both in the Industrials sector. MAS currently leads with a composite score of 6.3/10 (Consider Buy) compared to FBIN's 4.8/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer