AlphaStocks

FANG vs VAL

As of Sep 20, 2026, Diamondback Energy (FANG) scores 4.1/10 and Valaris (VAL) 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so VAL scores higher. FANG trades 5% below its model fair value.

FANG

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

4.1

Weak

$192.43

VAL

Valaris Ltd

4.6

Weak

$83.77

FANG vs VAL: Which is the Better Investment?

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) scores 4.1/10 while Valaris Ltd (VAL) scores 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Valaris Ltd has the higher composite rating of Weak. On a P/E basis, Valaris Ltd trades at 6.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricFANGVAL
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.1/104.6/10
RatingWeakWeak
Price$192.43$83.77
P/E Ratio33.46.0
ROE4.4%35.0%
Market Cap$54B$6B
Fair Value$203.08
Dividend Yield2.2%
Sector Rank#51 of 80#37 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralStrong
BuffettNeutralAttractive
GrahamNeutralNeutral
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattCautionAttractive
View full FANGanalysis →View full VALanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

FANG vs VAL: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Valaris Ltd (VAL) are both in the Energy sector. VAL currently leads with a composite score of 4.6/10 (Weak) compared to FANG's 4.1/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer