EAT vs PZZA
As of Sep 20, 2026, Brinker International (EAT) scores 7.2/10 and Papa Johns International (PZZA) 2.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so EAT scores higher. EAT trades 16% below its model fair value.
EAT
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
7.2
Consider Buy
$196.75
PZZA
PAPA JOHNS INTERNATIONAL INC
2.6
Avoid
$19.79
EAT vs PZZA: Which is the Better Investment?
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) scores 7.2/10 while PAPA JOHNS INTERNATIONAL INC (PZZA) scores 2.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, PAPA JOHNS INTERNATIONAL INC trades at 21.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | EAT | PZZA |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 7.2/10▲ | 2.6/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Avoid |
| Price | $196.75 | $19.79 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.7 | 21.4▲ |
| ROE | 53.7%▲ | -6.9% |
| Market Cap | $9B | $653.8M |
| Fair Value | $234.41 | — |
| Dividend Yield | — | 5.5% |
| Sector Rank | #13 of 194▲ | #179 of 194 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Graham | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
Related comparisons
EAT vs PZZA: Which Stock Scores Higher?
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and PAPA JOHNS INTERNATIONAL INC (PZZA) are both in the Consumer Discretionary sector. EAT currently leads with a composite score of 7.2/10 (Consider Buy) compared to PZZA's 2.6/10 (Avoid).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer