AlphaStocks

DEA vs VNO

As of Sep 20, 2026, Easterly Government Properties (DEA) scores 5.4/10 and Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) 7.9/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so VNO scores higher. DEA trades 25% below its model fair value; VNO trades 38% above its model fair value.

DEA

Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

5.4

Consider Buy

$23.38

VNO

VORNADO REALTY TRUST

7.9

Strong Buy

$34.91

DEA vs VNO: Which is the Better Investment?

Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) scores 5.4/10 while VORNADO REALTY TRUST (VNO) scores 7.9/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. VORNADO REALTY TRUST has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, VORNADO REALTY TRUST trades at 7.2x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Easterly Government Properties, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricDEAVNO
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score5.4/107.9/10
RatingConsider BuyStrong Buy
Price$23.38$34.91
P/E Ratio81.07.2
ROE1.0%16.2%
Market Cap$1B$7B
Fair Value$31.35$25.38
Dividend Yield8.4%1.8%
Sector Rank#33 of 104#1 of 104
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettStrongStrong
GrahamAttractiveStrong
LynchLimited DataNeutral
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full DEAanalysis →View full VNOanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

DEA vs VNO: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) and VORNADO REALTY TRUST (VNO) are both in the Real Estate sector. VNO currently leads with a composite score of 7.9/10 (Strong Buy) compared to DEA's 5.4/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer